How to Help Hiring Managers Make Smarter Hiring Decisions

The success of Talent Acquisition and Human Resources teams hinges on the quality of hires across the organisation. But when hiring decisions are left to busy Hiring Managers who view interviewing as a secondary skill, mistakes happen. That’s why HR and TA teams must equip Hiring Managers with the right tools, frameworks, and guidance to make smarter, more confident hiring decisions. Here’s how.

1. Highlighting the Importance of Hiring

1.1 Understanding the Impact of a Good Hire

As a first step, HR and TA should emphasise to Hiring Managers the importance of making smarter hiring decisions. Stress that the right candidate not only fills an immediate need, but contributes to retention, innovation, and organisational growth. When Hiring Managers understand that their interview approach affects employee satisfaction, performance, and even the company’s bottom line, they are more likely to adopt structured and deliberate hiring practices.

HR can illustrate this with examples of how well-planned interviews have led to higher retention and stronger teams - or by highlighting the importance of structured interviewing in making fair and consistent hiring decisions.

1.2 Understanding the Impact of a Bad Hire

HR and TA teams can also help Hiring Managers understand the real impact of a poor hiring decision, by framing it in terms of tangible costs and team consequences. For example, they can explain that a single mid-level hire in the UK (earning around £42,000) can cost over £130,000 when factoring in recruitment fees, lost productivity, training, and replacement, and even small businesses may face losses of up to £15,000 per bad hire. You can also emphasise the hidden effects, such as reduced team morale, increased workloads for colleagues, and slower productivity.

2. Strategies to Enabling Better Interviews

2.1 Crafting Job Descriptions as a Foundation

Hiring teams should make sure to equip Hiring Managers with job descriptions that clearly outline skills, responsibilities, and success criteria, serving as the foundation for better evaluation. A well-written job description helps Hiring Managers know exactly what to look for in candidates and minimises the risk of subjective assessments.

Including examples of desired behaviours, growth potential, and “what success looks like” helps managers evaluate candidates consistently. This approach also ensures attraction of candidates who are aligned with the team’s goals and culture.

Pro-tip: Collaborate with current employees in similar roles to identify key skills and responsibilities.

2.2 Providing Structured Interview Guidance

If you want Hiring Managers to be as confident as possible in their hiring decisions, it's essential to provide them with structured interview templates, question banks, and scoring rubrics. All of these tools should be based off of your current competency frameworks and skills matrices, and align with the skills covered in the aforementioned job descriptions.

You may also want to share sample answers and benchmarks via interview shadowing or banks of training materials, so Hiring Managers can be confident in assessing candidate responses. Remember that using tools like Evidenced enables hiring teams to create reusable interview templates and scoring rubrics, making it easy for Hiring Managers to follow best practices live during interviews.

2.3 Leveraging Data to Guide Decisions

Hiring teams should aim to provide Hiring Managers with data-driven insights from recruitment metrics, such as decision alignment amongst teams, time-to-hire, and quality-of-hire metrics.

By making your process openly data driven, Hiring Managers can make informed decisions rather than relying solely on intuition. Data can also reveal patterns in candidate quality, highlight potential gaps in evaluation, and help Hiring Managers adjust their approach over time.

Pro-tip: Encourage Hiring Managers to review post-interview data regularly, discussing trends and adjustments in debrief sessions to continuously improve hiring decisions.

3. Shaping a Strong Hiring Culture

3.1 Reinforcing Accountability and Consistency

Hiring Managers often have different interviewing styles, which can lead to uneven candidate assessments. HR and TA should try to establish accountability measures, such as standardised interview scorecards, post-interview debriefs, and scoring rubrics. This ensures that all candidates are evaluated fairly and consistently, and that hiring decisions are defensible and evidence-based.

By using tools like Evidenced, hiring teams are able to tracks interviewer performance, highlight inconsistencies, and see immediately which Hiring Managers need more guidance or training.

Pro-tip: Regularly review interview feedback with Hiring Managers to ensure scoring aligns with evaluation criteria and company standards.

3.2 Creating a Continuous Feedback Loop

A culture of continuous improvement benefits both Hiring Managers and the organisation. Both HR and TA can gather feedback from other managers, interviewers, and candidates to refine processes, improve questions, and strengthen evaluation frameworks over time.

This creates an environment where Hiring Managers are learning and improving with each hire, and feel like they can always ask for help if the interview process feels overwhelming.

Pro-tip: Aim to gather any candidate satisfaction scores as near to the time of the interview as possible, to reduce the risk of their rating being swayed by their application status.

Conclusion: HR and TA as Strategic Partners in Hiring

HR and TA are uniquely positioned to equip Hiring Managers with the guidance, structure, and confidence they need to hire smarter. By explaining the importance of great interviews, providing structured frameworks, offering data insights, and shaping a strong hiring culture, your hiring team can ensure Hiring Managers make decisions that benefit candidates, their own success metrics, and the organisation as a whole.

Want your Hiring Managers to run better interviews? Book a quick demo